EDITORIAL: Free for all: Universal school meal plans deserve strong consideration - Brownsville Herald: Editorials

default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
Logout|My Dashboard

EDITORIAL: Free for all: Universal school meal plans deserve strong consideration

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, September 12, 2019 3:15 pm

Dedicated consumers of news might have noticed a growing trend: students being “meal shamed” when they don’t have the money to pay for their school lunches. Such students, and those whose families are behind in their payments for school lunches, are barred from eating the schools’ regular meals. Rather than let them go hungry, schools give them something else, usually a bologna, peanut butter-and jelly or cheese sandwich.

It’s a real trend; NBC News, which recently reported on a student whose lunch was taken out of his hands on his birthday because his family owed $9.75 in lunch money, noted that 75% of school districts nationwide reported delinquency in school payments, a 70% increase since 2012.

To be honest the issue doesn’t affect most Rio Grande Valley families; most Valley students get school meals at no cost — sometimes breakfast, lunch and dinner.

It’s because they are poor. The National School Lunch Program, operated by the U.S. Department of Agriculture under directives in the federal Farm Bill, subsidizes meals for students who meet poverty-level criteria. When a certain

percentage of a school’s or district’s students qualify for the subsidies the institutions are given “community eligibility,” and all of the school’s or district’s students can receive free meals. All but one Valley district — Point Isabel — has community eligibility.

That’s a good thing, in more ways than one. Advocates note that many children get their only meals of the day at school. But because those meals must meet nutrition guidelines, they help ensure that the students eat well, even though schools can’t force them to eat everything they’re offered.

A new Georgia State University study found that students in the NSLP can be healthier than those who aren’t. As a whole more of them are in healthy weight ranges for their ages and height, and they have a lower body mass index, which notes how much of a person’s weight is fat.

It should be noted that the differences, although measurable, are not large.

But might full participation in the meal program reduce health care costs and offset at least part of

the program’s cost? It’s a question worth asking.

According to the USDA’s Economic Research Service, about three-fourths of all school lunches are subsidized. If so many students qualify for the meal program, and the poorest districts provide free meals to all students, can’t the wealthier districts do the same?

President Obama’s Education Secretary Arne Duncan and Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack supported that very idea. They noted the health benefits, saying the meals improved school nutrition, and that it would eliminate the administrative costs and burdens of tracking what students qualified for free lunch and whether those who didn’t were paid up in their meal accounts.

Those officials are gone, but growing numbers of education and humanitarian advocates support the idea of universal free meals. If participation already is high and the meals help improve students’ health, it’s worth considering.

The change surely would save many students a lot of grief, and probably make a lot of Point Isabel families happy.

Online Features

Pet Central


Having a pet is a lot of responsibility, and we’ll help by giving you lots of tips and tricks! More >>



Our fitness articles will help teach you how to work out with gym- and home-based exercises. More >>



Enjoy the crosswords challenge in our free daily puzzles, from the harder Sunday crossword to the quicker daily. More >>



Every Sudoku has a unique solution that can be reached logically. Enter numbers into the blank spaces so that each row, column and 3x3 box contains the numbers 1 to 9. More >>