Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
Joshue Vince/The Monitor
Glenn Holzer paddles down the Rio Grande in an organized group protest on July 14 in Roma regarding the border fence installation. Local officials and federal lawmakers continue to protest the construction slated to begin in September.
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Construction of border fence to begin in the fall

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

Local officials and federal lawmakers will continue to protest the construction of a border fence despite statements by the Department of Homeland Security that groundbreaking on the project will be in September.

Both expressed outrage on newly released reports by Secretary Michael Chertoff that he would talk to local communities on the fence design, but would give them no veto power.

“Well then what the heck are they going to talk to us about? Are they going to ask us what color do we want the fence. Do we want brick and mortar,” said Cameron County Judge Carlos H. Cascos, who met with federal lawmakers last week to discuss the issue.

Chertoff is quoted in the Houston Chronicle saying he expects construction in Texas to begin this fiscal year, which according to the government’s calendar ends Sept. 30.

Details on the fence project show a chart of 370 miles of fence to be built along the border between the United States and Mexico. Texas is to have 153 miles, Arizona 129, California 76 and New Mexico 12.

The wall is opposed not only by officials and lawmakers, but environmental groups, agricultural groups and water suppliers as well who fear it could affect the wildlife and water supply.

Cascos said he isn’t surprised that the building could begin in two months since the majority of the country wants the wall built as well as many federal lawmakers.

“They see videos of the herds of people running across the border in San Diego and they hear about these people that are assaulting people that are illegal aliens. Only along the border are people against the fence,” Cascos said.

The border fence came under fire early this year after it was revealed that the government planned to build a portion of it in the Rio Grande Valley. Officials said they were not consulted with as promised by the DHS.

U.S. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, plans to voice his concerns to Chertoff and wants to find out why the border fencing is being “handled in such a ham-fisted sort of way.”

“I’m very frustrated by the unilateral actions and basically the inconsistencies of the Department of Homeland Security when it comes to this issue. They do not have any appreciation of sensitivity of this issue and how controversial it is,” Cornyn said in a conference call with reporters.

Instead of building a fence, officials and lawmakers said the government should consider a weir project, or repairing the levees along the Rio Grande, which already serves as a natural barrier.

Chertoff said the government will consult with communities on the type of fencing to be installed. It won’t be a solid wall or a double layer of fencing on either side of the border road, the Chronicle reported.

Nobody wants border security more than Hidalgo County Judge J.D. Salinas, who lives three miles from the river and has five children under the age of 10.

But, the government should focus on hiring more U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents and cleaning the carrizo cane along the river banks to make it easier for agents to detect undocumented immigrants.

“In the history of the world, (walls) have never worked. … A wall or fence will not arrest one single person and put them in the county jail. A border patrol agent and customs agents will,” Salinas said.

U.S. Rep. Solomon P. Ortiz, D-Corpus Christi, believes the same and said the government is stepping on the rights of landowners who have voiced opposition.

“They are trampling over the rights of communities, the rights of landowners, the rights of business owners with no regards on how they are going to be impacted. … It’s wrong for them to say, ‘we are going to listen to you, but you have no veto power,’” Ortiz said.


See archived 'Local' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


ADVERTISEMENT 
Publish your Stuff (beta)
ADVERTISEMENT 
Should government officials strictly adhere to the Texas Open Meetings Act?
Yes
No
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site