Subscribe to the Newspaper
View the Online Newspaper
Publish your Stuff
Need Help? Click Here
Search: Site   Web
Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size
What is this?

Save & Share this Article

Silly games

Comments 0 | Recommend 0

It's time to put away costly toys, stop spending on ‘virtual' fence

We do love our toys, especially when we don’t have to pay for them.

To their credit, some government officials are finally starting to tire of pouring taxpayers’ money into the $6.7 billion "virtual fence" along the border. President Obama might cut nearly $200 million from the project.

The Bush administration announced the project, with a hefty contract for its friends at Boeing, to cover our southern border with the system that seeks to integrate radar, heat and motion sensors and cameras to catch the flood of people encroaching our borders every day.

Unfortunately, the system’s not catching many people.

The project was announced in 2005, and was to be finished next year. Delays and logistical problems pushed the target date back to 2014, and new reports show that the system is still plagued with problems.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has asked that the whole project be reviewed. "Americans need border security now — not 10 years down the road," Napolitano said, adding that the government needs to start looking for more reliable and cost-effective options.

The plans were ambitious. Fed with billions of our tax dollars, Boeing promised all kinds of new gadgets: remote-controlled cameras and all kinds of sensors — even real-time Internet feeds so interested civilians could monitor the system and call Border Patrol officials if they saw something.

But the heat sensors couldn’t tell the difference between a person and a coyote; bushes rustling in the breeze set off the motion sensors. The camera controls responded slowly to remote commands, and by the time operators turned the lenses to catch something they thought they had seen, whatever it was had already moved away.

Thousands of people did log on to the Internet sites to help keep vigil on the areas the cameras covered. The system recorded some 39 million Web hits. The virtual posse’s efforts, combined with all the other materials, netted about a dozen arrests and a couple of drug captures.

The original premise was to set up a surveillance system that would lessen the need for human patrols. Millions of such security systems, albeit on a much smaller scale, work just fine at homes and businesses across the country. Those systems, however, were bought by people on a budget, who demanded results and could jump to another vendor if not satisfied.

With virtually carte blanche to pick taxpayers’ pockets, however, federal officials were attracted to shiny new toys — toys that just didn’t work.

It’s time to put away the toys, and invest the money into making our immigration system more efficient. Better, faster processing of applications and elimination of senseless, arbitrary quotas will enable more people to gain legal residency. That will do more to reduce illegal immigration than any bells and whistles ever would.


See archived 'Viewpoints' stories »
 


Reader Comments
From the editor: Many of you have expressed concerns about some of the harsh anonymous comments from readers. To remedy that, we are introducing new features. You can create your own blog, publish your news and share your photos with the community. Once you fill out a simple form and leave a verifiable e-mail address, you can set up your profile page. It will display all of your contributions and allow you to track issues and easily connect with others.

We want our site to be a place where people discuss and debate ideas that foster stronger communities. We built this for you. Please take care of it. Tolerate broad thinking, but take action against obscene or hateful material. Make it a credible and safe place worth preserving and sharing.


ADVERTISEMENT 
Featured Events

 
  • Find an Event
Publish your Stuff (beta)
ADVERTISEMENT 
Do you think Mexican drug cartels have been strongly affected by recent weapons and drug seizures by the military?
Yes.
No.
Enter The Code To Vote
 
Read Related Article
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site